How German Is American?
GROWING INTO THE NATION
T hroughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, most
German-speaking immigrants to the U.S. settled outside of
large cities; hence some of the most direct expressions of older
German-American identity can be found in small-town settings. Many
or most Americans of German descent, it is said, were not interested
in politics on the national level. It has been pointed out that although
more Americans claim German ancestry than any other, only two
presidents, Hoover and Eisenhower, were of German heritage.
Nevertheless, the relative lack of direct German-American involvement
in national politics does not reflect apoliticism. Instead, there is
a unique political culture of many Americans of German background,
especially those whose ancestors came during the colonial era, like the Pennsylvania Dutch, which has been described by the
historian Steven Nolt as “peasant republicanism.” This culture,
whose origins trace back to the social conditions of Central Europe,
is a curious mix of conservative and progressive elements. On the
one hand, rural Germans respected the authority of inherited traditions
and institutions. On the other, they valued individual liberty. In
the U.S. context, rural German Americans often voted for the national
party that favored stronger local control. Shortly after the Revolution,
that was the anti-Federalist
Republican Party of Thomas Jefferson.
Later, the populist Democrat Andrew Jackson enjoyed widespread
support among rural Americans, especially the Pennsylvania Dutch.
The early German-American peasant republican spirit is exemplified by the newspaper Der Deutsche Porcupein, published in Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, whose 1798 masthead is shown here. The newspaper’s name was inspired by an English journalist
and political commentator, William Cobbett (1763–1835), who
wrote under the pseudonym “Peter Porcupine.” The image was considered
an apt one for journalists of the time: the porcupine is by
nature a passive creature that defends itself only when attacked, and
then with its sharp quills. Note that the angel flying over the porcupine
is trumpeting “Preßfreyheit!” (freedom of the press). O ften sharper than the journalist’s quill is the cartoonist’s
pen. At the end of the nineteenth century, as today, no
major political conflict went unaddressed by cartoons on
the editorial pages of American newspapers. The medium of the political
cartoon was indelibly shaped by the German-born artist and
caricaturist Thomas Nast (1840–1902). An ardent Radical
Republican supporter of Abraham Lincoln, Nast first achieved prominence
for his depictions of the horrors of slavery and the Civil War.
His fame grew when his caricatures played a major role in the
downfall of the notorious leader of the Tammany Hall political
machine in New York, William M. “Boss” Tweed. He is credited with
creating a number of classic American cultural icons, including
Santa Claus, the Republican elephant and the Democratic donkey,
the Tammany tiger, Columbia, and John Chinaman, a stereotypic but
sympathetic rendering of Chinese immigrants, whose concerns,
along with those of the Native American, Nast championed.
The image presented here includes two more of Nast’s creations,
the stout personification of Great Britain, John Bull, and none other
than Uncle Sam. Here Kaiser Wilhelm I of Germany stands between
America and Britain, helping to resolve a long-standing dispute over
claims to the San Juan Islands in the Pacific Northwest. At the time
this cartoon was published, on November 16, 1872, the Kaiser’s
decision in favor of the U.S. had just been announced. Reference is
made in this cartoon to another disagreement between the U.S. and
Britain that had recently been settled, namely the so-called Alabama claims. Specifically, the U.S. had argued that Britain had violated its
official neutrality during the Civil War when British shipbuilders built
and refitted Confederate ships. The Washington Treaty of 1871 had
stipulated that the Alabama claims would be arbitrated by a five-member
Geneva Tribunal, which included the German Kaiser; and on
September 14, 1872, the Tribunal had announced that Britain should
pay the U.S. a settlement
in the amount
$15.5 million. The
money bag in the
picture reminds us
of this, and the caption “It Never Rains
But It Pours” underscores
the fact that
two major decisions
in favor of the U.S.
had just been made
within two months,
with the German
Kaiser party to both
of them.
Despite, or perhaps because of, many German Americans’ interest
in protecting their local situation, they followed such national and
international affairs closely, often with concern. After the Civil War,
when the U.S. continued to grow geographically and demographically,
Americans felt tension both at home and abroad. Conflicts
over territories escalated between the U.S. and other nations, as the
image depicts here. Within the U.S., the various waves of immigrants
from Ireland, Germany, and southern and eastern Europe left
many old-stock Americans—including many now well established
German Americans—feeling threatened, especially during times of
economic crisis; and this led to the formation of nativist, anti-immigrant
political parties such as the Know-Nothings. Overall during
these decades, American patriotism swelled and often crossed the
line into nationalism.
At the same time, as this period in American history coincided
with the rise of the newly unified German Empire, some German
Americans, especially those living in urban areas, felt a certain
amount of pride that their once fragmented ancestral homeland was coming into its own on the international scene. But only two generations
later, the events of World War I compelled many to remove the
hyphen” and assimilate. World War I, with the anti-German sentiments
it engendered, has often been assigned sole blame for the“submergence” of German-American identity. Yet many of the internal
and external pressures to assimilate, which were felt by
Americans of German descent, did not arise primarily s the result
of the war.
T homas Nast’s Uncle Sam has most definitely endured in
America as a personified symbol of the nation. Events in
Europe over the past century, though, have meant that there
is no equivalent figure, male or female, in today’s Germany. Flag-waving
patriotism in the U.S., even when it borders on nationalism,
is very much a part of American national culture, but in today’s
Germany the black-red-gold colors are rarely displayed except at
international sports events. Nevertheless, public expressions of patriotism
and nationalism were not uncommon in Germany in the past;
especially after German unification in 1871, national self-esteem was
running high among Germans in Europe. In this country, German
Americans sought to emphasize the positive aspects of both sides of
the hyphen referred to above by underscoring the contributions of
traditionally German virtues to the American national experience,
thus forging a German-American national identity. One important
tool in the construction of this identity was the press.
Wisconsin’s German-language publications appeared as early as
1844, and Milwaukee was a leading national center for German-
American print culture. In the early years, large numbers of travel
reports and guides for newcomers were printed, including books
with advice on farming, cooking, health, legal advice, learning
English, etc. The dual identity
of many early German
Americans is reflected in the
publication shown here,
Unser Adoptiv-Vaterland.
Published in Milwaukee in
1889, this book is a history
of the U.S., which presents
the major moments in
American history in the
immigrants’ mother tongue.
As is reflected by the subtitle
(“with special consideration
of the German-American element”), it includes a short section detailing
the part played by Americans of German descent in the development
of the U.S.
The following quote from Unser Adoptiv-Vaterland is representative
of the sentiments of many German Americans who hoped that
German virtues would influence the American national character in
positive ways: “Mögen deutsche Gründlichkeit, Beständigkeit und
Treue auch fernerhin die Kennzeichen des deutschen Elementes in
den Vereinigten Staaten bleiben und sich dem americanischen
Nationalcharacter immer schärfer und bestimmter aufprägen!” (May
German diligence, steadfastness, and loyalty continue to be the hallmarks
of the German element in the United States and imprint themselves
ever more indelibly upon the American national character!)
In addition to print media, education was an important vehicle for
promoting a national identity that was fundamentally American,
but strongly influenced by the German heritage. For decades, hundreds
of thousands of American children, and not only those of
German background, received instruction in German in private,
parochial, and public schools. In many schools all subjects were
taught in German, while others offered bilingual instruction.
Das A.B.C. in Bildern (ABC in Pictures) published in 1905 by
McLoughlin Bros., Inc., New York, is an example of a publication for
German-speaking children in America. At the turn of the twentieth
century many Americans (over 30% in some Midwestern states)
spoke German in their homes, often in the second or third generation.
In schools, children learned to read and write in German, but
in an American context. In the image shown here a child is
introduced to the letter “F” and the word “Fahne” (flag), written in
German Fraktur. The accompanying picture of the “Fahne,” however,
is the American flag, an example of the patriotic expressions in this
country’s public life discussed above, as well as the patriotism felt by
immigrants from Germany toward their new homeland.

Das A.B.C. in Bildern evokes America’s rich history of teaching
children in languages other than English, but it also recalls the significant
influence of German practices and theories on American primary
and secondary education in general. Many U.S. schools
adopted German concepts of early-childhood education, higher
education for girls, vocational education, and structured teacher
training and certification. The first successful American kindergarten
was founded in 1856 by German immigrant Margarethe Mayer
Schurz, wife of Carl Schurz, in Watertown, Wisconsin. Many of
these educational ideas were adapted to conditions in America,
while other aspects of the German system, such as its three-tiered
secondary education structure, were never introduced. Interestingly,
German ideas for educational reform often found more acceptance
in America than in Central Europe itself, especially Prussia, where
the inertia of tradition remained strong.
Image from the Max Kade Institute Library.
At the post-secondary level, the concept of a research university in
which students pursued a major course of study and learned in seminars,
rather than just large lectures, was derived directly from nineteenth-century German ideals. Today, at the beginning of the twenty-first
century, there are signs of U.S. influence on German education:
Germany is moving toward adopting certain American educational
practices, especially at the university level, by creating B. A. programs,
seeking private sources of funding (and student fees), and
increasing access to a wider range of students.
Next: Shaping Culture
[This booklet is available in PDF format:
http://mki.wisc.edu/HGIA/HGIA_booklet.pdf ]
How German Is American? Homepage
|